HomeLibraryAdvanced @enMaster Play in Bridge by Terence Reese

Master Play in Bridge by Terence Reese

This article is concerned with one of the most important and least analysed forms of defensive play, the attack on entries before declarer can use them.

Creating Entry Trouble

To set the mood, we will begin with a fairly spectacular example:

et

North opened 1spade and South, after discovering that his partner held two aces, forced the bidding up to 6club. West led heart suit7 and East won the first trick with jack. He returned a diamond up to weakness, whereupon South drew trumps, led a heart to the ace and played East for heart suitK, making twelve tricks.

East should have foreseen this danger and should have returned a heart at trick 2 to cut liaison. That would have held South to two heart tricks in all and he would have had to lose a spade or a diamond.

Taking Advantage of a Blocked Suit

The point of the defence on the last hand was that East had to return a heart while West had a trump with which to interrupt the run of the suit. More often, the object of such play is to attack an entry before declarer has had an opportunity to unblock one of his suits.

et

South opened with a forcing bid and went to 4heart suit on his own. West led diamond suit5, and East won with ace, and South dropped the king. When East returned a spade South went up with the ace, cashed diamond suitQ, entered dummy with heart suitJ and discarded a loser on diamond suitJ. This gave him ten tricks.

If West’s diamond suit5 was to be read as fourth best, East, by deducting 5 from 11, could have worked out that South had two diamonds higher than the 5 (Rule of 11). These were obviously diamond suitK-Q, so the right defence was to return a trump at trick 2, killing dummies only entry before diamond suitJ could be enjoyed. A dry honor combination such as South’s diamond suit K-Q is the usual sign that declarer may have entry trouble. The defenders recognised this and cooperated to fine effect on the next deal from a match between England and Eire.

et

The Irish pair reached 3 NT, which looks doubtful on the North-South hands but is not easy to defeat. Declarer won the club lead in dummy and pushed spades, East won the second round. East made a good switch at this point, leading a low heart in preference to a club. West won with heart suitK and played heart suitJ, which held the trick. The position was now:

et

A club is the obvious play, but West looked more deeply into the position. He saw that if declarer had diamond suit A-Q, together with a club trick, as seemed likely from East’s failure to continue the suit, he would have enough tricks for game if a club were played now. Better defence was a diamond, while the clubA was still in the way. So West led diamond suit8 and East correctly withheld his king. Declarer made diamond suitQ and diamond suitA but had to concede two hearts at the finish.

An Attack from Long Range

This is another ordinary seeming hand on which the defence’s opportunity to create entry trouble is seldom noticed:

et

West opened club4 against 4heart suit and East won the first two tricks. The presence of a long suit in dummy generally suggests the need to attack entries, but the lead of a spade up to dummy’s weakness seemed obvious and East switched to spadeJ. South won with ace and ducked a round of diamonds; East played a second spade and the king won. Now South laid down heart suitA, led a diamond to the ace and ruffed a diamond with heart suitJ: when trumps broke 2-2 he was able to set up the fifth diamond. It was not an obvious defence by any means, but East should have returned a trump at trick 3. A count of entries would have shown him that dummy’s diamonds could be killed, so there was no hurry to attack spades, South would have won the trump lead and ducked a diamond; then East plays a second trump; this is the killer, for it makes South use an entry to dummy before he has begun to ruff diamonds.

Esta entrada también está disponible en: Spanish

RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular

Recent Comments