HomeLibraryAdvanced @enBest Defense of 1994: Zia Mahmood by Alan Truscott

Best Defense of 1994: Zia Mahmood by Alan Truscott

Player: Zia Mahmood

Journalist: Alan Truscott

From The New York Times

The most brilliant defensive play at the American Contract Bridge League’s Summer Nationals in San Diago will very likely prove to be the best of 1994.  It occurred on the diagramed deal from an early round of the Spingold Knockout Team Championship and the hero was Zia Mahmood a colourful Pakistani expert who lives in Manhattan but is usually playing Bridge somewhere else.

Zia held the East hand and defended 3NT.  North’s 2 bid at his second turn was “new Minor forcing” asking South about his Major suit holdings.  West therefore led a Diamond since that was the only suit that had not been genuinely bid.

spade suit AJ1063

 K62

 A106

107

spade suit Q73

 J983

 973

 AK9

spade suit 985

 74

 KJ54

 Q863

spade suit K2

 AQ106

 Q82

 J542

South  West   North   East

1         Pass   1spade suit          Pass

1NT      Pass    2         Pass

2         Pass   3NT       Pass

Opening Lead:  3

First, consider how the play would have gone with normal defense. South plays low from Dummy and East wins the King and returns the suit. South sees that he can make at most eight tricks unless he brings in at least three Spade tricks so he plays for West to have the spade suitQ and finds he has ten tricks. That sequence was followed when Zia’s teammates held the North/South cards.

Zia Knew that the Spades were favorably placed so he tried to confuse the issue for Declarer.  When the 6 was played from Dummy Zia played the J. This play was not going to cost anything, whoever held the Q.

When South won the Q, he was convinced that the K was on his left, which meant that he could take three Diamond tricks, not two. This offered the prospect of taking seven Red suit tricks plus two Spade tricks, so he played three top Hearts. When the Jack failed to drop he confidently finessed the 10 and was considerably deflated when Zia produced the K and shifted to the Q, defeating the contract.

 

Esta entrada también está disponible en: Spanish

RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular

Recent Comments