Sacrificing May be Cheap or Expensive by Phillip Alder

Print Friendly

Considering how the opponents would have done is important when you have sacrificed as in this deal from …

By Phillip Alder
On 19 January, 2016 At 11:16

Category : Uncategorized

Responses : Comments are off for this post

Related Posts


get smarter at bridge by Phillip Alder
Print Friendly

McCook Daily Gazette – 5 Oct 2006

Novelist and screenwriter Rita Mae Brown claimed: “For you to be successful, sacrifices must be made. It’s better that they are made by others, but failing that, you’ll have to make them yourself.”

Occasionally, we sacrifice at the bridge table, especially when nonvulnerable against vulnerable opponents. We hope to concede fewer points than the opponents would have received for their highest-scoring contract.

Considering how the opponents would have done is important when you have sacrificed as in this deal from a pair event in Anaheim, California a few years ago.

Opening lead: Club King

North’s three-spade jump was preemptive showing four-card support and a weak hand. (With game-invitational values he would have cue-bid three hearts.) West passed to let his partner judge whether to bid higher or to double, and East went for the penalty.

Against four spades doubled. West led the club king. The defenders took three clubs and two diamonds before playing a third diamond. South ruffed, cashed his spade ace, led a heart to the ace on the board and  despite “eight ever, nine nearly never” ran the spade jack. Why?

The double implied that East would have the spade queen, but if trumps were breaking 2-2, four spades was a phantom sacrifice. North and South having four top tricks: two spades and two hearts if the spades were 3-1, though, the sacrifice would be good business, costing 300 for down two against 420 for four hearts bid and made.

Hence South’s taking the spade finesse.

Esta entrada también está disponible en: Spanish

Comments are closed.