Zar Points by Zar Petkov Part 8
By
• 18 February, 2014
We will assess the accuracy of four different methods of bridge distribution evaluation via some standard common mathematical approaches.
By
• 18 February, 2014We will assess the accuracy of four different methods of bridge distribution evaluation via some standard common mathematical approaches.
By
• 14 February, 2014The Restrictions What restrictions? Good question.
By
• 11 February, 2014So do you have to be aggressive or conservative in bridge? I hope you know the answer to that question – it’s both
By
• 7 February, 2014Fit Re-evaluation: The fact that we have a 6-card trump suit, for example
By
• 7 February, 2014So your partner has already opened, the main consequence being that YOU are in offensive bidding while the opponents have been already pushed in the defensive track. How does this affect your hand evaluation?
By
• 5 February, 2014What kind of weight to put on the components you consider valuable is not a matter of "expert judgment", but a…
By
• 3 February, 2014If Zar Points look a bit aggressive to you, let’s have a look at several opening hands from the just-passed First Open European Championship in Menton, France.
By
• 1 February, 2014Never miss a game again? That’s easy – simply bid a game on every board 🙂 While Bob Hamman’s note that “Bidding is only 3% of the game of bridge” may be true, if you don’t bid your games…